Use distinguishable (human-readable) bridge interface name instead of br-7da... #5893
Talkless
started this conversation in
Feature Requests
Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
-
i think this is one of those things which is so niche, to specific users it probably won't get altered, however there is an option to set this create this file networks:
coolify:
driver_opts:
com.docker.network.bridge.name: br-coolify this would get merged with the compose when installing/upgrading, meaning you are free to choose what you want here |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Cool, didn't new there was But it has no effect after install.sh ("upgrade"), maybe it would have effect only during first install..?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
Currently in my installation (Debian 12 host) Docker has created bridge interface with name
br-7da043d4db4d
.Zone-based firewall managers like
firewalld
,Shorewall
,foomuuri
, etc., needs to specify interface names to map it into the zone, and havingbr-7da043d4db4d
specified there is kinda not really self-explanatory, nor "stable". I guess reinstalling Coolify or doing other changes might change that generated name?Apparently, docker supports setting custom interface name, so
docker-componse.yaml
could looke something like this (NOT actually tested):See: https://docs.docker.com/engine/network/drivers/bridge/#options
See: https://docs.docker.com/reference/compose-file/networks/#driver_opts
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions