Replies: 1 comment
-
Was coming to create an issue for this - maybe a flag like bigEndian/littleEndian (or lsb/msb) to change ordering would be sufficient, rather than having to restructure the order of the packet? I know there are some validation rules about packet order so having a setting/flag might be easier to implement without breaking compatibility. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Bits are often represented the lowest bit on the right and the higher bits on the left. So 8 - 0 vs 0 - 8. Currently there seems to only be one option for the packet diagram. It would be very useful to be able to set a config parameter to reverse the order or allow the order to be specified in reverse.
packet-beta
0-1: "System Mode"
2: "Rec Flag"
3: "ACK Flag"
4: "GPS PPS Flag"
5-7: "Scan type"
vs
packet-beta
7-5: "Scan type"
4: "GPS PPS Flag"
3: "ACK Flag"
2: "Rec Flag"
1-0: "System Mode"
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions