Skip to content

fix: Set tournament for nodes test harness #15346

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2025

Conversation

ivov
Copy link
Contributor

@ivov ivov commented May 13, 2025

Copy link

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mrge reviewed 2 files and found no issues. Review PR in mrge.io.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@n8n-assistant n8n-assistant bot added core Enhancement outside /nodes-base and /editor-ui n8n team Authored by the n8n team node/improvement New feature or request labels May 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

✅ All Cypress E2E specs passed

@ivov ivov merged commit 0699925 into master May 13, 2025
44 checks passed
@ivov ivov deleted the set-tournament-for-nodes-test-harness branch May 13, 2025 12:21
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request May 19, 2025
@janober
Copy link
Member

janober commented May 19, 2025

Got released with [email protected]

ozcangungor pushed a commit to ozcangungor/n8n that referenced this pull request May 25, 2025
etobella pushed a commit to etobella/n8n that referenced this pull request May 25, 2025
Alexandero89 pushed a commit to Alexandero89/n8n that referenced this pull request May 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core Enhancement outside /nodes-base and /editor-ui n8n team Authored by the n8n team node/improvement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants