docs: mount.md - idmapped mounts only work for root user #25106
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Please cleanup the trailing whitespace. |
rhatdan
reviewed
Jan 23, 2025
Fixed in the new commit |
eriksjolund
reviewed
Jan 24, 2025
As reported in containers#24918 and clarified in containers/crun#1632 (comment) Signed-off-by: Evstifeev Roman <[email protected]>
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Fak3, giuseppe, Luap99 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
stale-locking-app
bot
added
the
locked - please file new issue/PR
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As reported in #24918 and clarified in containers/crun#1632 (comment)
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?