-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 273
🌱Enable forcetypeassert linter in golangci-lint #2394
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
🌱Enable forcetypeassert linter in golangci-lint #2394
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Andrii Soldatenko <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Hi @andriisoldatenko. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a metal3-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm fine with the nolints as they are in the test code
ev = c.NewValue.(string) | ||
ev, ok := c.NewValue.(string) | ||
require.True(t, ok) | ||
assert.Equal(t, ev, updateOp.Value) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this assert should be after the if statement as it was. Otherwise we are only checking it when the expected value is "".
// TODO: need to double check what to return in case of bad type assert. | ||
return bootModeCapabilities[bootMode] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks ok to me. @dtantsur what do you think?
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR resolves #2357