Skip to content

OCPBUGS-5182: validate additional confidential VM types #6733

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4 r4f4 commented Jan 2, 2023

Deploying IPI cluster on azure cloud in the 'westeurope' region with VM size as EC96iads_v5 or EC96ias_v5, installation fails with below error:

12-15 11:47:03.429 level=error msg=Error: creating Linux Virtual Machine: (Name "$infraID-bootstrap" / Resource Group "$infraID-rg"): compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=400 -- Original Error: Code="BadRequest" Message="The VM size 'Standard_EC96iads_v5' is not supported for creation of VMs and Virtual Machine Scale Set with '' security type."

From azure portal, we can see that the type of both VM sizes EC96iads_v5 and EC96ias_v5 is confidential compute.

Deploying IPI cluster on azure cloud in the 'westeurope' region with VM
size as EC96iads_v5 or EC96ias_v5, installation fails with below error:

12-15 11:47:03.429  level=error msg=Error: creating Linux Virtual Machine: (Name "$infraID-bootstrap" / Resource Group "$infraID-rg"): compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=400 -- Original Error: Code="BadRequest" Message="The VM size 'Standard_EC96iads_v5' is not supported for creation of VMs and Virtual Machine Scale Set with '<NULL>' security type."

From azure portal, we can see that the type of both VM sizes EC96iads_v5 and EC96ias_v5 is confidential compute.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 2, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-5182, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.13.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Deploying IPI cluster on azure cloud in the 'westeurope' region with VM size as EC96iads_v5 or EC96ias_v5, installation fails with below error:

12-15 11:47:03.429 level=error msg=Error: creating Linux Virtual Machine: (Name "$infraID-bootstrap" / Resource Group "$infraID-rg"): compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=400 -- Original Error: Code="BadRequest" Message="The VM size 'Standard_EC96iads_v5' is not supported for creation of VMs and Virtual Machine Scale Set with '' security type."

From azure portal, we can see that the type of both VM sizes EC96iads_v5 and EC96ias_v5 is confidential compute.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented Jan 2, 2023

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jhixson74 and m1kola January 2, 2023 15:00
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 2, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-5182, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jinyunma

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jinyunma January 2, 2023 15:01
@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Jan 4, 2023

/retest-required

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Jan 4, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 4, 2023
@jinyunma
Copy link
Contributor

jinyunma commented Jan 9, 2023

pre-merged verification is passed, see details in bug comments.
/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Jan 9, 2023
@jhixson74
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-azure-ovn
/test e2e-azure-ovn-resourcegroup
/test e2e-azure-ovn-shared-vpc

@jhixson74
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 18, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jhixson74

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 18, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 9aed759 and 2 for PR HEAD c7e4e72 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 19, 2023

@r4f4: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive c7e4e72 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-azurestack c7e4e72 link false /test e2e-azurestack

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD fec300b and 1 for PR HEAD c7e4e72 in total

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented Jan 19, 2023

/skip

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 07f1d7a into openshift:master Jan 19, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-5182 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Deploying IPI cluster on azure cloud in the 'westeurope' region with VM size as EC96iads_v5 or EC96ias_v5, installation fails with below error:

12-15 11:47:03.429 level=error msg=Error: creating Linux Virtual Machine: (Name "$infraID-bootstrap" / Resource Group "$infraID-rg"): compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=400 -- Original Error: Code="BadRequest" Message="The VM size 'Standard_EC96iads_v5' is not supported for creation of VMs and Virtual Machine Scale Set with '' security type."

From azure portal, we can see that the type of both VM sizes EC96iads_v5 and EC96ias_v5 is confidential compute.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor Author

r4f4 commented Jan 19, 2023

/cherry-pick release-4.12

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@r4f4: new pull request created: #6785

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants