-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
[Test] openai-e2e: change model #2454
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
/hold |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
checking flakiness - iteration 3 (prev 2 passed) |
checking flakiness - iteration 4 (prev 3 passed) |
@@ -348,7 +450,6 @@ def test_token_counters_for_query_call_with_improper_payload() -> None: | |||
|
|||
@pytest.mark.introspection | |||
@pytest.mark.rag | |||
@retry(max_attempts=3, wait_between_runs=10) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we need the retry under test_rag_question as it's been one of our flakiest tests. The retry is what has been getting it to pass.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
note: It's happening due to exceeding query limits for azure_openai. We can try to ask Microsoft about this but if the retry can be there, I'd say it's probably easier to handle.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know.. This PR is not final yet..
I am running it multiple times to see if we are still getting error or not (and for which model).. so removed all retries..
I will revert this in this PR itself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
okok, thank you!
checking flakiness - iteration 5 (prev 3/4 passed) |
29755fa
to
6b1d21d
Compare
/test 4.18-e2e-ols-cluster |
0b3afd7
to
6c811e0
Compare
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@asamal4: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
OLS-1657
Testing with different gpt models