Fixes kClient namespace in createKubernetesAdapter()

[mik-dass]

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What does this PR do / why we need it:

It fixes kClient namespace in createKubernetesAdapter()

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #4609

PR acceptance criteria:

• Unit test

• Integration test

• Documentation

• I have read the test guidelines

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer:

• The scenario mentioned in odo push fails on "namespace mismatch" for the component created with default project #4609 should pass.

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mik-dass

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• pkg/devfile/OWNERS [mik-dass]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[prietyc123]

I tested on minikube. Also on PSI, changes works fine.

$ odo push --context testpsi/

Validation
 ✓  Validating the devfile [181650ns]

Creating Kubernetes resources for component abcdef
 ✓  Waiting for component to start [32s]
 ✓  Waiting for component to start [7ms]
 ⚠  Unable to create ingress, missing host information for Endpoint 3000-tcp, please check instructions on URL creation (refer `odo url create --help`)


Applying URL changes
 ✓  URLs are synced with the cluster, no changes are required.

Syncing to component abcdef
 ✓  Checking files for pushing [306589ns]
 ✓  Syncing files to the component [108ms]

Executing devfile commands for component abcdef
 ✓  Waiting for component to start [2ms]
 ✓  Executing devbuild command "npm install" [3s]
 ✓  Executing devrun command "npm start" [1s]

Pushing devfile component abcdef
 ✓  Changes successfully pushed to component

/lgtm

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[kadel]

/override ci/prow/psi-kubernetes-integration-e2e
/override ci/prow/psi-minishift-integration-e2e
/override ci/prow/psi-openshift-integration-e2e

[openshift-ci-robot]

@kadel: Overrode contexts on behalf of kadel: ci/prow/psi-kubernetes-integration-e2e, ci/prow/psi-minishift-integration-e2e, ci/prow/psi-openshift-integration-e2e

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/psi-kubernetes-integration-e2e
/override ci/prow/psi-minishift-integration-e2e
/override ci/prow/psi-openshift-integration-e2e

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.