Skip to content

gcp: PODVM_IMAGE_NAME is the right name #585

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2025

Conversation

beraldoleal
Copy link
Member

The annotation is LATEST_IMAGE_ID but the configmap value is _NAME. I would prefer to not touch on the metadata now, since the metadata.annotation is the same for all providers.

The annotation is LATEST_IMAGE_ID but the configmap value is _NAME. I
would prefer to not touch on the metadata now, since the
metadata.annotation is the same for all providers.

Signed-off-by: Beraldo Leal <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from littlejawa and tbuskey March 19, 2025 15:46
@beraldoleal beraldoleal requested a review from bpradipt March 19, 2025 16:44
Copy link
Contributor

@littlejawa littlejawa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the commit that introduced it: it seems you were using the right name everywhere else, it's just this one.

/lgtm
Thanks @beraldoleal !

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 19, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 19, 2025

@beraldoleal: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Member

@gkurz gkurz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thanks @beraldoleal !

@gkurz gkurz merged commit 354ce53 into openshift:devel Mar 19, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants