tests: mark option-niche-eq as fixed on LLVM 21 #141654
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
durin42
force-pushed
the
randomly-fixed-test
branch
from
bf76810 to
90052eb
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
durin42
force-pushed
the
randomly-fixed-test
branch
from
90052eb to
a963e6f
Compare
|
I think we can close #49892, unless you want to break out the |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #141312 (Add From<TryLockError> for io::Error) - #141495 (Rename `{GenericArg,Term}::unpack()` to `kind()`) - #141602 (triagebot: label LLVM submodule changes with `A-LLVM`) - #141632 (remove `visit_mt` from `ast::mut_visit`) - #141640 (test: convert version_check ui test to run-make) - #141645 (bump fluent-* crates) - #141650 (coverage: Revert "unused local file IDs" due to empty function names) - #141654 (tests: mark option-niche-eq as fixed on LLVM 21) Failed merges: - #141430 (remove `visit_clobber` and move `DummyAstNode` to `rustc_expand`) - #141636 (avoid some usages of `&mut P<T>` in AST visitors) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2025
Rollup merge of #141654 - durin42:randomly-fixed-test, r=jieyouxu tests: mark option-niche-eq as fixed on LLVM 21 Some combination of recent Rust changes (between 3d86494 and aa57e46 from what I can tell) and changes in LLVM 21 (not recently, as best I can tell) have caused this test to start showing the behavior we want, so it's time to move this test to a proper place and mark it as fixed on LLVM 21. ~~Probably "fixes" #49892, but I'll let others make that call.~~ Closes #49892 unless we want to break out a dedicated issue for `Option<bool>::eq` on LLVM 20 (seems low-value). `@rustbot` label llvm-main
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/miri
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#141312 (Add From<TryLockError> for io::Error) - rust-lang/rust#141495 (Rename `{GenericArg,Term}::unpack()` to `kind()`) - rust-lang/rust#141602 (triagebot: label LLVM submodule changes with `A-LLVM`) - rust-lang/rust#141632 (remove `visit_mt` from `ast::mut_visit`) - rust-lang/rust#141640 (test: convert version_check ui test to run-make) - rust-lang/rust#141645 (bump fluent-* crates) - rust-lang/rust#141650 (coverage: Revert "unused local file IDs" due to empty function names) - rust-lang/rust#141654 (tests: mark option-niche-eq as fixed on LLVM 21) Failed merges: - rust-lang/rust#141430 (remove `visit_clobber` and move `DummyAstNode` to `rustc_expand`) - rust-lang/rust#141636 (avoid some usages of `&mut P<T>` in AST visitors) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some combination of recent Rust changes (between 3d86494 and aa57e46 from what I can tell) and changes in LLVM 21 (not recently, as best I can tell) have caused this test to start showing the behavior we want, so it's time to move this test to a proper place and mark it as fixed on LLVM 21.
Probably "fixes" #49892, but I'll let others make that call.Closes #49892 unless we want to break out a dedicated issue for
Option<bool>::eqon LLVM 20 (seems low-value).@rustbot label llvm-main